Programs›Women's Track & Field›College of Charleston (South Carolina) vs University of North Carolina Wilmington
Women's Track & Field · head to head
College of Charleston (South Carolina) vs University of North Carolina Wilmington
Division I · Coastal Athletic Association
| College of Charleston (South Carolina) | University of North Carolina Wilmington | |
|---|---|---|
| 34 | Roster | 80 |
| room for 11 | Room under the D-I cap | 35 over |
| 5 | Coaches | 9 |
| $160,523 | Team budget | $326,666 |
| $4,721 | Spend per roster spot | $4,083 |
| 3rd | Budget percentile | 10th |
| 987 | APR (multi-year) | 982 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $3,607,330 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,707,880 |
| 10,660 | Undergraduates | 14,494 |
| 72% | Admitted | 74% |
| 1130–1300 | SAT middle 50% | 1220–1360 |
| 65% | Graduate in 6 years | 71% |
| $56,976 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $42,698 |
| $20,806 | Net price after grants | $18,606 |
| 1.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.96 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board