Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges vs Pomona-Pitzer Colleges
Women's Track & Field · head to head

Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges vs Pomona-Pitzer Colleges

Division III · Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.
Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps CollegesPomona-Pitzer Colleges
51Roster37
3Coaches6
$127,192Team budget$141,312
$2,493Spend per roster spot$3,819
70thBudget percentile74th
—APR (multi-year)—
—Players retained—
$0Athletic aid, women's teams$0
1,381Undergraduates1,664
11%Admitted7%
1450–1560SAT middle 50%1480–1560
95%Graduate in 6 years93%
$86,500Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$85,300
$29,978Net price after grants$17,423
3.59Violent offences per 1,0003.53
SuburbSettingSuburb

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division III median budget is $84k and the median roster 39.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board