Programs›Women's Track & Field›Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville
Division I · Big South Conference
| Charleston Southern University | University of North Carolina Asheville | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Roster | 83 |
| 31 over | Room under the D-I cap | 38 over |
| 2 | Coaches | 7 |
| $797,731 | Team budget | $452,890 |
| $10,496 | Spend per roster spot | $5,456 |
| 40th | Budget percentile | 16th |
| 946 | APR (multi-year) | 988 |
| 95% | Players retained | 98% |
| $2,608,458 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,285,462 |
| 2,914 | Undergraduates | 2,907 |
| 76% | Admitted | 94% |
| 950–1160 | SAT middle 50% | 1170–1350 |
| 49% | Graduate in 6 years | 55% |
| $47,220 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $39,627 |
| $21,347 | Net price after grants | $14,175 |
| 0.26 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.29 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board