Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville
Women's Track & Field · head to head

Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville

Division I · Big South Conference
Charleston Southern UniversityUniversity of North Carolina Asheville
76Roster83
31 overRoom under the D-I cap38 over
2Coaches7
$797,731Team budget$452,890
$10,496Spend per roster spot$5,456
40thBudget percentile16th
946APR (multi-year)988
95%Players retained98%
$2,608,458Athletic aid, women's teams$1,285,462
2,914Undergraduates2,907
76%Admitted94%
950–1160SAT middle 50%1170–1350
49%Graduate in 6 years55%
$47,220Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$39,627
$21,347Net price after grants$14,175
0.26Violent offences per 1,0002.29
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board