Programs›Women's Cross Country›Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville
Women's Cross Country · head to head
Charleston Southern University vs University of North Carolina Asheville
Division I · Big South Conference
| Charleston Southern University | University of North Carolina Asheville | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 994 | APR (multi-year) | 993 |
| 98% | Players retained | 99% |
| $2,608,458 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $1,285,462 |
| 2,914 | Undergraduates | 2,907 |
| 76% | Admitted | 94% |
| 950–1160 | SAT middle 50% | 1170–1350 |
| 49% | Graduate in 6 years | 55% |
| $47,220 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $39,627 |
| $21,347 | Net price after grants | $14,175 |
| 0.26 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 2.29 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board