Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›Chapman University vs Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges
Women's Track & Field · head to head

Chapman University vs Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges

Division III · Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.
Chapman UniversityClaremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges
38Roster51
1Coaches3
$87,961Team budget$127,192
$2,314Spend per roster spot$2,493
52ndBudget percentile70th
—APR (multi-year)—
—Players retained—
$0Athletic aid, women's teams$0
7,874Undergraduates1,381
56%Admitted11%
1250–1430SAT middle 50%1450–1560
80%Graduate in 6 years95%
$85,080Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$86,500
$48,037Net price after grants$29,978
1.02Violent offences per 1,0003.59
CitySettingSuburb

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division III median budget is $84k and the median roster 39.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board