Programs›Women's Track & Field›California State University, Sacramento vs University of California, Riverside
Women's Track & Field · head to head
California State University, Sacramento vs University of California, Riverside
Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
| California State University, Sacramento | University of California, Riverside | |
|---|---|---|
| 93 | Roster | 112 |
| 48 over | Room under the D-I cap | 67 over |
| 5 | Coaches | 5 |
| $1,283,489 | Team budget | $756,665 |
| $13,800 | Spend per roster spot | $6,755 |
| 65th | Budget percentile | 38th |
| 980 | APR (multi-year) | 980 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $3,349,801 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $2,621,353 |
| 28,268 | Undergraduates | 22,646 |
| 94% | Admitted | 63% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 56% | Graduate in 6 years | 77% |
| $41,298 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $71,062 |
| $11,183 | Net price after grants | $13,533 |
| 0.74 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board