Programs›Women's Track & Field›California State University, Fresno vs University of California, Riverside
Women's Track & Field · head to head
California State University, Fresno vs University of California, Riverside
Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
| California State University, Fresno | University of California, Riverside | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Roster | 112 |
| 51 over | Room under the D-I cap | 67 over |
| 6 | Coaches | 5 |
| $1,525,694 | Team budget | $756,665 |
| $15,892 | Spend per roster spot | $6,755 |
| 73rd | Budget percentile | 38th |
| 963 | APR (multi-year) | 980 |
| 96% | Players retained | 98% |
| $4,460,456 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $2,621,353 |
| 21,430 | Undergraduates | 22,646 |
| 96% | Admitted | 63% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 55% | Graduate in 6 years | 77% |
| $35,630 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $71,062 |
| $7,303 | Net price after grants | $13,533 |
| 0.2 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board