Programs›Women's Tennis›California Institute of Technology vs Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges
Women's Tennis · head to head
California Institute of Technology vs Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges
Division III · Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.
| California Institute of Technology | Claremont McKenna-Harvey Mudd-Scripps Colleges | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Roster | 12 |
| 3 | Coaches | 5 |
| $116,457 | Team budget | $257,346 |
| $8,958 | Spend per roster spot | $21,445 |
| 84th | Budget percentile | 96th |
| — | APR (multi-year) | — |
| — | Players retained | — |
| $0 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $0 |
| 1,023 | Undergraduates | 1,381 |
| 3% | Admitted | 11% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1450–1560 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 95% |
| $86,886 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $86,500 |
| $23,397 | Net price after grants | $29,978 |
| 6.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 3.59 |
| City | Setting | Suburb |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division III median budget is $60k and the median roster 10.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board